Mark Twain’s philosophy is, then, much different than Emerson or Thoreau. Mark Twain’s story is like an entire joke, all while a character is telling a story that is to be perceived as a joke. Everything Emerson and Thoreau write is supposed to be taken seriously and they write about important things of their time that are still important today to make people look at things differently. Even when Thoreau writes “Walking”, a story about the art of walking, it is meant to be taken earnestly. Thoreau says: “I have met with but one or two persons in the course of my life who understood the art of Walking, that is, of taking walks, who had a genius, so to speak, for sauntering” (Thoreau). After this, he goes on about the word ‘sauntering’ for an entire paragraph. He is so serious when it comes to walking, but it is something he is passionate about. It is similar to Emerson’s fixation with nature, and how, as Wayne explains, he sees the two versions of nature, the common and philosophical (Wayne). Mark Twain does not have this obsession with the universe and understanding it through self-education; he just seems to write a story for entertainment purposes.
Thoreau, Henry David. "Thoreau's Walking." The Thoreau Reader. Web. 29 Feb. 2012.
Twain, Mark. “The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County.” Comp. Jeffrey D. Wilhelm, Ph.D. and Douglas Fisher, Ph.D. Glencoe Literature. American Literature ed. Columbus: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2009. 498-502. Print.
Wayne, Tiffany K. "Nature." Critical Companion to Ralph Waldo Emerson: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work, Critical Companion. New York: Chelsea House Publishing, 2010. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?ItemID=WE54&SID=&iPin=CCRWE0088&SingleRecord=True (accessed January 30, 2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment